Quantcast The Daily Collegian
College Media Network

Veterans voice opposition to Iraq war

Eric Schlichte, Collegian Staff

Issue date: 4/11/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
The event began with clips from a movie, whose poster hangs in the background -
Media Credit: Jeromie Whalen/Collegian
The event began with clips from a movie, whose poster hangs in the background - "Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan."

Students and veterans spoke at an IVAW event on Wednesday night against the war in Iraq.
Media Credit: Jeromie Whalen/Collegian
Students and veterans spoke at an IVAW event on Wednesday night against the war in Iraq.

The IVAW have set a list of demands, including the immediate withdrawl of all troops from Iraq.
Media Credit: Jeromie Whalen/Collegian
The IVAW have set a list of demands, including the immediate withdrawl of all troops from Iraq.

Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) held an event Wednesday night to voice their opposition to United States involvement in Iraq.

Since its inception in 2004, IVAW has made three demands: the immediate withdrawal of all occupying forces in Iraq, reparations for the human and structural damages Iraq has suffered and full benefits, like adequate health care (including mental health) and other supports for returning servicemen and women.

The evening started off with film clips from "Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan," an event held in Washington, D.C., last March. The footage served to set the tone as veterans discussed the ineffectiveness of U.S. forces in urban areas, racial issues, a disregard for the rules of engagement and a lack of leadership from the higher-ups in the chain of command. All of these problems would be further expounded upon by the IVAW panel from the Amherst chapter.

The IVAW panel spoke to a predictably anti-war crowd of about 80 people for more than two hours, with each veteran explaining his or her own experiences and drawing on them to show why they are now opposed to the Iraq war.

The first speaker was Adrienne Kinne, the Regional Coordinator for IVAW in New England who served actively as well as in the reserves for a decade. Kinne decried the U.S. government and military for its deceptive practices.

"It is wrong and immoral to use the tragedy of 9/11 to try to gain support in the United States to kill thousands of innocent civilians," she said. "How many Sept. 11ths is that?"

Kinne went on to discuss the cost of the war at home such as the crisis in veteran health care. She detailed how the government would not screen for certain mental illnesses in returning veterans because so many cases would be found. She claimed the government would not have the resources to treat them all.

Mike Van Valkenburg's focus was the dehumanization of the enemy seen in Iraq. He noted the prevalence of racial slurs and the overall degradation of the Iraqi people. He also recalled how he had been told by an officer, "You have to kill the women and children too, some day they may be the terrorists."

Each veteran who had served in Iraq made it clear that improper conduct did not stem from the lower ranks and extend upward as everything "starts from the top and goes to the bottom," he said.

One testimony came from Michael LeDuc, an inactive Marine who was in the second Battle of Fallujah. LeDuc detailed how the rules of engagement were completely different in Fallujah than other areas of the country and how the Marines were instructed to fight before taking the city.

"To sum it up, if you see an individual with a weapon, kill him," said LeDuc, in reference to what a superior told the infantry before the invasion. "A pair of binoculars, kill him. A cell phone, or running from one building to another, kill him. If he has a white flag and is doing anything at all, assume it's a trick and kill him."

He added that Marines were falsely told the city was devoid of any non-combatants and that if they felt uncomfortable at all to "shoot everything that moves."

Nathan Lusignan, who served in Iraq at the beginning of the American occupation in 2003 and 2004, also spoke .

"The worst comes out in that environment," he said referring to armed conflict between U.S. forces and Iraqi citizens. "Maybe they're afraid or don't think they'll get caught."

Lusignan revisited an incident where an Iraqi vehicle failed to stop in time at a checkpoint and was subsequently shot up, destroying the driver's legs and crippling him for life. Lusignan said this was due to poor communication and that it made him realize the futility of the Iraq war, acknowledging the event as his personal turning point against the war.

The event was put on by the Amherst chapter of the IVAW in conjunction with the Western Massachusetts Campus Antiwar Network. Students can visit the IVAW website at www.IVAW.org or www.campusantiwar.net/chapters/umass for more information.

To join IVAW, one must have served active duty, reservist or National Guard since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Eric Schlichte can be reached at eschlich@student.umass.edu.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

The Massachusetts Daily Collegian has an 'open door' policy with regards to reader comments. In the interest of facilitating an open discourse, comments are not screened or edited for spelling, mechanics or content. Comments on our website cannot be verified by The Collegian and in no way represent the opinions of The Massachusetts Daily Collegian or its staff.

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 10

Recker

posted 4/11/08 @ 10:53 AM EST

Funny how the IVAW pukes don't mention that what makes civilians and civilian vehicles a threat to US troops is that the terrorists don't wear any kind og identifying clothing (uniform) or distinguishing symbol (a patch, shirt, scarf, even a armband), and use civilian vehicles as car bombs. (Continued…)

L33to

posted 4/11/08 @ 12:01 PM EST

IVAW members are not only veterans but avowed antiwar activists with a specific political agenda.

Like any other type of agenda-oriented political activist advocating for a cause primarily (if not entirely) based on personal testimonies, it is therefore in their best interest to exaggerate, omit, and de-contextualize information as needed to suit their aims. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

L33to

posted 4/11/08 @ 1:47 PM EST

"The only agenda that IVAW has is to see our troops brought home from Iraq immediately, that our government takes care of them upon their return, and that America begin to make amends to the Iraqi people for basically destroying their country's entire infrastucture. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Mike

posted 4/11/08 @ 4:45 PM EST

Adrienne makes some great points and brought forward some valuable topics to be considered. I'm glad she took the time to respond to "L33to".
Mike

L33to

posted 4/11/08 @ 6:37 PM EST

Well "Mike", I too am glad you took the time to respond to me, the rightful ruler of House Atreides and eternal enemy of filthy Harkonnens.

"The latest Brookings report (Feb '08, page 49) showed that 77% of the Shia, and 95% of the Sunni who were polled said they were somewhat to strongly opposed the presence of Coalition Forces in Iraq. (Continued…)

Mike

posted 4/11/08 @ 8:10 PM EST

My reference to the broader picture of US involvement in the Middle East since the 1950's can be confusing so I'll expound. Iran is a different than country Iraq, and after the US backed coup prevented former Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh from nationalizing Iranian resources the US solidified its position in Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with the Baghdad Pact and corporate expansion. (Continued…)

Borat Sagdiyev

posted 4/12/08 @ 10:15 PM EST

Yes yes, this nice. Very nice. I like.

Maybe I inquire how I join group your War Against Iraq Veterans of? I too am veteran from war against Russia. (Continued…)

Courtney Mulroy

posted 4/17/08 @ 12:41 AM EST

Does anyone know who the younger fellow in the second picture is?

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What is the best part about Thanksgiving?
Submit Vote

View Results

24 Hour News

Advertisement